Skip to content

Rio Ferdinand needs to keep up the heat on Roy Hodgson

Jun 5, 2012, 8:00 AM EDT

England football veteran defender Rio Fe Getty Images

This is a fight Rio Ferdinand should have waged the moment England’s squad was announced. Granted, we all knew John Terry would be chosen over him. We also knew there was no way Ferdinand and Terry would be in the squad together. That doesn’t make the selection any less dubious.

Or “morally very suspect,” a description attributed to Ferdinand by The Guardian. Gee, you think? Select a man who’s on trial (with significant video evidence supporting the charges) over a former captain? And for the sake of keeping a Chelsea-centric back line together? While that policy doesn’t break any commandments, it’s also not going to be part of anybody’s standards and practices documentation. It’s a horrible choice.

Retracing the John Terry-Rio Ferdinand backstory

But as I write, it occurs to me: There may be some people reading this who aren’t familiar with the Terry-Ferdinand backstory. Don’t worry. This isn’t Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton. In fact, up until about three years ago, this was a viable center-half tandem for England’s national team, making it even more pathetic that the two men, approaching the end of their international careers, can’t get on the field together.

Since early 2010, so many briefs have been filed in Terry v Ferdinand that we assume everybody knows why there’s an implied tension between the two defenders. Still, it might do us some good to go back a couple of years and see what’s led to this point.

  • In February 2010, various allegations of misconduct lead to John Terry being stripped of England’s captaincy.
  • Rio Ferdinand, then vice-captain, ascended to the position, but a knee injury suffered in training for the World Cup meant Steven Gerrard wore the armband in South Africa.
  • Concerns over Ferdinand’s fitness (specifically, his ongoing back problems) led to Terry being re-named captain by Fabio Capello in March 2011.
  • In November 2011, John Terry was placed under investigation for racial abusing a player during a Premier League match. That player: Ferdinand’s younger brother, Anton.
  • In December, Terry was formally charged with using racist language. His trial is set to take place after the European Championships, with Terry having already pled not guilty.
  • England’s FA stripped Terry of the captaincy once again, leading Fabio Capello to resign from his position as head coach.
  • Roy Hodgson, Capello’s replacement, named Gerrard his permanent captain and selected Terry to his Euro 2012 squad. Ferdinand was excluded.
  • Hodgson claims the choice was a pure football decision while it is widely speculated Hodgson sought to avoid teaming Terry and Ferdinand.
  • Pre-Euro 2012 injuries forced Hodgson to replace three players (Gareth Barry, Frank Lampard, and Gary Cahill). Despite choosing two new defenders (Phil Jagielka, Martin Kelly), Ferdinand was not brought into the team.

A World in which Martin Kelly’s Preferred to Rio Ferdinand

There are vague reports claiming Manchester United manager Alex Ferguson told Hodgson that Ferdinand’s health would preclude using the 33-year-old in consecutive games. Regardless, it’s difficult to see Hodgson selecting Martin Kelly over Ferdinand unless Terry’s presence wasn’t a factor.

Kelly has payed two minutes of international soccer (last week against Norway). He doesn’t start for Liverpool. At Euro 2012, he would be third choice at left or right back, fifth choice in the middle.

Ferdinand, meanwhile, could be justified as a starter, if not England’s best defensive option in any match for which he is healthy. He is a former captain, has 81 caps, made 30 league appearances for United last season, and (by all accounts) is a well-liked, respected player for both club and country.

source: Getty ImagesFor Hodgson, Situation Keeps Getting Worse

There’s no way Hodgson comes out of this looking good. If you believe that he excluded Ferdinand for competitive reasons, then you have to question Hodgson’s decision-making. If you don’t believe him, then he’s being dishonest, disrespectful and “morally .. suspect.”

Regardless, Hodgson is abdicating his responsibility as a manager. Although it’s always been implied that Terry-Ferdinand is an either-or situation, it’s not. Hodgson doesn’t have to choose. At some point, he could have tried and broker an arrangement that saw both players named to the squad. It wouldn’t be the first time in managerial history that a coach had to intervene between players.

Would it have worked? Given the history that’s built up, probably not. But at least Hodgson would be going through the process. At least he would be placing the responsibility on the players to work through their issues. If one of them couldn’t make the necessary sacrifices, they’d be volunteering to be excluded. Hodgson needed to ask for that sacrifice.

Ferdinand may have balked, and with good reason. Would you want to play next to a man who’d racially abused your brother? And that gets to the heart of Ferdinand’s “morally very suspect” complaint.

No matter how you slice it, Hodgson is condoning Terry’s actions. John, you may have done these things, but it’s OK. We’d rather sacrifice Rio than lose you. We’d rather see a respected member of our set-up lose out on his last chance to participate in a major tournament than look at that nasty video of you abusing Anton Ferdinand. If that means being so intimately linked with somebody who’s capable of those actions, so be it.

Even if Ferdinand’s feelings are being relayed to the press via third-parties, he should take his case to the public. Having not been contacted by Hodgson or the FA since the original squad was announced, Ferdinand has little other recourse. As Hodgson’s pretenses are peeled away to expose the hypocrisy of his “footballing reasons,” Ferdinand has no obligation to stay quiet (and thereby condone Hodgson’s mistakes). He has every right for some degree of satisfaction, and while it won’t get him a plane ticket to Krakow, it might deliver him some base, visceral sense of justice.

If anything, Ferdinand should have spoken out more vehemently when the original 23-man squad was announced. We all suspected that he as being excluded because of the Terry conflict, yet we wanted to believe that Hodgson was beyond that. He’s clearly not. Ferdinand should have disillusioned us of that notion weeks ago. He should have put a spotlighted the issue at the onset: England elected to back a man due to be tried for racial abuse rather than include another deserving player in the squad.

ProSoccerTalk is doing its best to keep you up to date on what’s going on in Poland and Ukraine. Check out the site’s Euro 2012 page and look at the site’s previews, predictions, and coverage of all the events defining UEFA’s championship.

  1. arjanroghanchi - Jun 5, 2012 at 11:37 AM

    this is what i call holding your subject accountable. well done. great piece.

  2. richfe - Jun 5, 2012 at 5:28 PM

    This is what I call a superficial argument…jumping on a bandwagon. I’m sure you could do better…

    There are genuine football reasons that can be made for omitting Ferdinand without the need for a conspiracy theory, which should be at least acknowledged, and also for bringing Kelly into the squad this week instead of Ferdinand.

    Firstly: the sad fact is that Ferdinand has not been an England regular since 2008 (the last year he managed to represent England in more than half their games). His omission is not disrupting an established squad or centre-back partnership.

    Secondly: Ferdinand has a chronic back condition. The last 3 years he has failed to manage to play 40 matches over the course of the season for his club. This, together with knee and calf problems, has prevented him being an England regular. His club manager, Alex Ferguson has publicly stated that he cannot be relied upon to play 3 matches in 8 days, required for a tournament.

    Thirdly: Ferdinand is no longer the future of England. At 33 he would be the oldest member of the squad. Kelly at 22 may be the future, though he faces stiff competition from Richards, Smalling and Walker. If using this tournament with an eye to development you have to select some players who will be around for the next 4 years at least.

    Fourthly: Ferdinand cannot play at right back, or arguably even on the right of a 3 centre-back defence given the evidence against Croatia in Euro 2008 qualifying. A big weakness in the England squad was at right back with just Johnson and the non-specialist Jones as cover. Kelly is a specialist right back, bringing him into the squad actually provides more balance as there are already 4 specialist centre-backs. The imbalance was a mistake, but since the Hodgson had only had a couple of days working with the players hardly inexcusable.

    Fifthly: Ferdinand wasn’t on the stand by list or involved in any of the friendlies this year. Kelly has been.

    Sixthly: Ferdinand’s last 4 competitive matches for England have simply not reached the standard he set earlier in his career. His mistakes led to the sending off of Robert Green against Ukraine in 2009 (yes you have to go back three years for four competitive international matches he’s played in) and a goal leading to a draw against Switzerland in 2011.

    It cannot be doubted that Rio Ferdinand has been an excellent servant of English football over the past decade: at his best you could make a case for him being in an all time squad of 23. But there are genuine football reasons not to include him in this Euro 2012 squad, particularly as a replacement at this stage.

    Forgetting Ferdinand, the squad would arguably be stronger with Micah Richards than Kelly. If Richards had allowed himself to be put on standby I suspect he would now be in Poland.

  3. hjworton46 - Jun 6, 2012 at 4:11 AM

    The easy solution for Roy Hodgson, and this is where he’s gone terribly wrong very early in his tenure, would’ve been to omit both Rio and Terry. They’ve both been exposed at international level many times, neither will be in the squad should England qualify for the next world cup and rebuilding a creaking defence during a tournament – and giving younger players tournament experience – would be no bad thing considering the low expectations for the tournament as a whole. In selecting Terry and not Rio, Hodgson has shown an insensitivity that I’d have not expected from a manager renowned for his man management. He’s created this latest problem, and will have divided the squad down the middle by selecting Terry but not Rio.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Top 10 Player Searches
  1. M. Goodson (NFL)
  2. B. Beachy (MLB)
  3. G. Hill (NBA)
  4. D. Freeney (NFL)
  5. M. Garza (MLB)