Skip to content

Questions and answers about Julian de Guzman swap

Jul 13, 2012, 1:17 PM EDT

As with so many trades, the swap that sent Designated Player Julian de Guzman to FC Dallas raises as many questions than it answers.

On its face, it looks like a reasonable move for both teams.

source: Getty Images

De Guzman was going nowhere with Toronto FC. I’ve always said that he’s clearly a highly skilled sort. But I could never shake the feeling we were getting 70 cents on the dollar, so to speak, with the Canadian international. I always felt he could deliver more.

The de Guzman bottom line in Toronto is this: if a technical sort like himself wasn’t going to flourish under Dutch coach Aron Winter (and de Guzman didn’t, really), then what could he possibly do for Englishman Paul Mariner, who is now in charge at BMO? Not much, apparently, since the veteran midfielder had lost his starting spot to Terry Dunfield. Dunfield is far less technically proficient but apparently blessed with greater stockpiles of “want-do” and fight, something Mariner values above all.

The question now careening around BMO: What can Toronto do with the money and an available DP slot? As far as marquee men, the Reds are set at forward (Danny Koevermans) and in midfield (Torten Frings) but clearly need a defensive centerpiece.  In fact, here’s what Mariner told me just last week: “We are thin at the back, no two ways about it. We got some injuries there. …It’s pretty obvious we need that sort of [defensive] kingpin back there.”

For Dallas, the trade makes some sense, but questions do persist.

For instance, if a Canadian international wasn’t really willing to “leave it all on the field,” as they say, in Toronto, will his heart be in it for Dallas? And if not, could Dallas have done more with the cap money?

But that’s the rub, isn’t it? How much of de Guzman’s salary will Toronto continue to  absorb? I would suspect quite a lot.

And where, exactly, does de Guzman fit at FC Dallas Stadium?

He’s not a true defensive midfielder but could be used there as a replacement, now or next year, for Daniel Hernandez, whose 35-year-old knees surely can’t hold out much longer. Or, will de Guzman be a link between the defensive midfielder (Hernandez or Andrew Jacobson) and attacking midfielder David Ferreira?

That’s the role in which Dax McCarty excelled previously in Dallas.

  1. sportsviking - Jul 13, 2012 at 1:26 PM

    Seems like how good of a deal this is for Dallas hinges on how much of de Guzman’s salary they agreed to take. He’s a difference maker at best, just not worth the money Toronto was paying him. You make a good point about the flexibility this gives Toronto. If they can find a DP-caliber defender who can provide leadership and strengthen the back line, this is a great move.

    • Steve Davis - Jul 13, 2012 at 2:57 PM

      Precisely! It’s all about the $ … and how much of it remains on the TFC books.

  2. mrtuktoyaktuk - Jul 13, 2012 at 1:59 PM

    This was a shock move. The benching under Mariner, on top of a very underwhelming run out during Aron Winter’s time, were a clear sign that JDG wasn’t going to play a major role but most TFC fans were resigned to having to pay him a lot of money to do not very much until his contract expired. The shock part comes in finding a team, in MLS no less, willing to take him. However this merely creates an opportunity for TFC. If Mariner doesn’t find a quality signing, whether CB or DM (or even a striker, we’re weak everywhere), then the fans are likely to see this as just another chaotic moment in a chaotic year.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Top 10 Player Searches
  1. D. Wade (NBA)
  2. A. Eaton (MLB)
  3. L. James (NBA)
  4. M. Crabtree (NFL)
  5. K. Gausman (MLB)