Skip to content

London police open investigation into allegations against Mark Clattenburg

Oct 30, 2012, 5:09 PM EDT


London Metropolitan Police are getting involved in the Mark Clattenburg affair, starting an investigation after a complaint was filed by a London-based professional group. Thanks to law enforcement’s part, accusations Clattenburg racially abused multiple Chelsea players will likely follow the same course as the John Terry-Anton Ferdinand affair, not the Luis Suárez-Patrice Evra incident.

The difference could effect the length of the saga. When the criminal system got involved with the Terry accusation, England’s Football Association pulled back and waited for legal proceedings to conclude. Afterward, the FA charged and eventually suspended Terry for racial abuse of Ferdinand.

The Suárez incident was never handled by law enforcement. The FA conducted its own investigation, handing down an eight-match ban two months after the Oct. 15, 2011 incident.

Although the accusations against Terry stemmed from an incident on Nov. 2, 2011, the Chelsea defender wasn’t sentenced until Sept. 27, 2012.

Although the FA had already begun an investigation into Chelsea’s accusations, the federation will again have to demur. If charges are ever brought against Clattenburg, the evidence introduced in a potential trial will also carry weight in the FA’s proceedings.

In the Terry case, charges were brought on Dec. 21, 2011, though his criminal trial was postponed until after this summer’s European Championships.

A potentially significant detail of today’s story is the organization filing the complaint. Although the Society for Black Lawyers may have some tie to professional soccer, these charges seem to have been made by an entity that had nothing to do with Sunday’s game.

That law enforcement is investigating the complaint implies England’s game can no longer elect to police itself. When an incident like this is alleged to have occurred, any entity can ask law enforcement to become involved.

Perhaps we’ve seen the end to Luis Suárez-like situations, where the league handles the investigation. If anybody can bring acts on the field into the courts, somebody will.

  1. kingarthur900 - Oct 30, 2012 at 8:44 PM

    So, what is he alleged to have said? Without that bit, these reports make no sense.

  2. east96st - Oct 31, 2012 at 2:00 AM

    I wasn’t there, so I’m not going to pretend I know what was said. But wouldn’t a racist ref have a long, and easily documented, history of bias? Wouldn’t there be a record of disproportionate yellow and red cards? Looking the other way when a white player fouls a minority? Overreacting when a minority fouls a white? Middle School players and coaches can tell in the first ten minutes if “home cooking” by the officials at an away game is going on. I find it hard to believe if this guy is a racist, that the players and coaches didn’t know about it years ago based on how he called the game. Guys with hate in their hearts can’t hide it for 90 minutes week after week in a high pressure situation like that.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

PST Extra: Analyzing transfer deadline day