Skip to content

U.S. Soccer budging on qualifiers in Portland, Seattle

Dec 27, 2012, 8:00 AM EDT

Sports Illustrated’s Grant Wahl released these little nuggets last night on his Twitter feed, updates which could influence which venues get next year’s five U.S. Men’s National Team World Cup qualifiers:

Even with the caution implied by the second tweet, this is good news for Portland and Seattle. At least, it’s progress. Whereas before it was thought CenturyLink and Jeld-Wen fields were long shots to get any of The Hex’s games, now it seems U.S. Soccer is willing to be flexible in order to get final round qualifying matches in two highly desirable venues.

Seattle’s virtues are obvious. True, it’s a big football stadium in a day and age when Soccer Specific Stadium is becoming dogma, but consider the upside. It’s a huge football stadium, meaning we could see around 70,000 people backing the U.S. for a meaningful match.

And unlike other places that can draw similar crowds, Seattle’s is likely to be heavily pro-U.S. That’s something you couldn’t say in Los Angeles or Dallas. Even New York’s crowds tend to include a large number of non-USMNT supporters. When was the last time the national team played in front of a supportive crowd that large?

source: Getty ImagesPortland’s virtues lie on the other end of the spectrum, but with the charged atmosphere Columbus’s Crew Stadium was able to generate for a recent qualifier, U.S. Soccer seems interested in pursuing similar venues – locations which may not sell tons of tickets but will generate an imposing, bandbox atmosphere.

That’s Portland. Jeld-Wen can’t hold much more than 20,000 people, but it might have best atmosphere in Major League Soccer. The full voice of the field’s crowded north end would give the U.S. the type of unique setting that proves problematic for teams not used to a venue.

There seem to be few drawbacks to trying to get Portland and Seattle in the rotation. Travel is often cited as a deterrent, but in instances where the U.S. is plays the first of a two qualifier set on the road, the extra distance from Europe is a non-issue.

Ultimately, this game with Portland and Seattle has to stop. We’ve heard the reasons why U.S. Soccer avoids the venues, but the reasons seem thin compared to the sacrifice of leaving two potentially strong home field advantages out of the rotation (and two large fan bases out of the loop).

And sometimes, it all feels like a game of chicken. Who will flinch first? Each side seems to think they have some leverage. U.S. Soccer makes the final decisions and are trying to use that power, but Portland and Seattle know they offer enough distinct virtues to hold firm on some basic issues. Until now, both sides seemed to be holding out.

So while the idea of qualifiers in the northwest is exciting, the big news to glean from Wahl’s reporting is some movement in that stalemate – an apparent compromise. U.S. Soccer is willing to play on something that isn’t permanent grass while Portland and Seattle have to bring in the sod.

It’s good news, even if the debate itself is a bit of a farce.

More on the farce of the fake stuff later on the blog.

  1. dfstell - Dec 27, 2012 at 8:45 AM

    I don’t get the angst. I mean…..they’d do a nice crowd, but as more and more soccer specific stadiums get built around the US, we have plenty of places that will do a nice crowd and be played on grass.

    I’m sick of this attitude that somehow these cities are owed these games because they somehow did something special for US soccer. I mean, they do have great crowds, but their fanbases are also kinda annoying to the rest of the country because they overreact to just about everything. Don’t love their coach? Flame on! Don’t name their players to a Best XI? Flame on. Mentioned their fake grass fields?? Holy crap….FLAME ON!!! Mention that nobody else cares about the Cascadia Cup or that it can’t be important when only one of the three teams is any good?? They go nuts!

    • charliej11 - Dec 27, 2012 at 11:19 AM

      Yeah, I meant to blog this, so this is probably the best time to do it.

      Sorry about that annoying thing in 2012. It is my resolution for 2013, quit caring so much.

      Again, sorry.

  2. sdbeisbol - Dec 27, 2012 at 9:21 AM

    Why doesn’t San Diego ever get any US games? It typically draws the best TV ratings for US games…especially during the WC.

  3. charliej11 - Dec 27, 2012 at 11:26 AM

    I went to the US qualifier last time it was in Portland, btw. You have no idea until you have been there. It comes across incredible on TV, it is better than that, way better than that.
    Same stadium ( not updated yet ) back then. Incredible.

    They root for the wrong team, but it should be on bucket lists.

    Seattle has to be the first choice. There will be a sell out, the tickets will be expensive, you know it will be loud, get over it people, just have it on the turf. I like having it in places like KC and Columbus, love the teams, love the fans, but get it in a real stadium with 67,000 fans for a home field advantage like Mexico does. ( Seahawks are 7-0 and the Sounders in front of packed houses, similar )

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

PST Extra: Analyzing transfer deadline day