<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That was quick: &#8216;Livestrong&#8217; already gone from Sporting Park</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prosoccertalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/16/livestrong-sporting-park-naming-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prosoccertalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/16/livestrong-sporting-park-naming-rights/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:50:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jsmith80</title>
		<link>http://prosoccertalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/16/livestrong-sporting-park-naming-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-8167</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jsmith80]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prosoccertalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171569#comment-8167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*Sporting* Sproting sounds funny though. lol]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Sporting* Sproting sounds funny though. lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jsmith80</title>
		<link>http://prosoccertalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/16/livestrong-sporting-park-naming-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-8166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jsmith80]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 14:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prosoccertalk.nbcsports.com/?p=171569#comment-8166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it was best that they parted ways, and glad to see Sproting move on quickly and put this behind them. 

I still think that the original idea of paying a charity organisation was brilliant though. I would love to see Sporting KC find another  large well known charity they could work this out with. One that doesn&#039;t rely on the legacy of one person that could tarnish or ruin it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it was best that they parted ways, and glad to see Sproting move on quickly and put this behind them. </p>
<p>I still think that the original idea of paying a charity organisation was brilliant though. I would love to see Sporting KC find another  large well known charity they could work this out with. One that doesn&#8217;t rely on the legacy of one person that could tarnish or ruin it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
