Skip to content

Eden Hazard apologizes, but a suspension is surely ahead

Jan 24, 2013, 8:55 AM EDT

Hazard head shot

Remember when athletes got in trouble for the usual tomfoolery and jackassery? You know, tawdry affairs, juicing, public intox, firearms violations and such.

Oh, there was the odd flying kung fu kick delivered here and there to the unsuspecting punk in the crowd. (Right, Eric Cantona? You showed that Selhurst Park meanie a thing or two, eh?)

Thing is, we came to understand how to deal with this stuff, what level of mea culpa was required and what punitive measure to mete out for restoration of public grace. Only now, it seems a whole new class of indiscretion has arrived.

I mean, frauds conducted on a global scale over a decade or more, wildly implausible fake girlfriend scandals, and now this: kicking ball boys in the stomach, for Pete’s sake!

What were you thinking, Eden Hazard?

(MORE: Yes, Eden Hazard really did that)

So now the public must build a whole new set of guidelines and best practices, it seems, for dealing with hyper-disgraced athletes.

Personally, I don’t know what it might take to reclaim public trust after Wednesday’s outrageous incident, but I believe it’s going to take more than this: the Chelsea attacker, who was enjoying such a wonderful season at Stamford Bridge prior to Wednesday’s mad moment, has issued an apology:

The boy put his whole body onto the ball and I was just trying to kick the ball and I think I kicked the ball and not the boy. I apologize,”

“The ball boy came in the changing room and we had a quick chat and I apologized and the boy apologized as well, and it is over. Sorry.”

Isn’t that cute that he believes “it’s over?”

MORE: Re-telling the Eden Hazard-ball boy incident

There will be fallout over this one, and quite possibly a suspension. Perhaps even a lengthy one, as this headline today out of England suggests.

  1. archlobster - Jan 24, 2013 at 9:30 AM

    That ball “boy” is practically a grown man, size-wise. I don’t feel the slightest bit sorry for him.

    Hazard acted stupidly and should be banned, but let’s keep the hyperbole out of this. It isn’t like he kicked a 9 year old ballboy at an MLS game. He banned a little cheating idiot who shamed Swansea’s staff with his actions.

    Pat Nevin put it best “His behaviour was disgraceful. I would have kicked the ball out from underneath him if he was behaving like that, 100%”

    • archlobster - Jan 24, 2013 at 9:31 AM

      Kicked, not banned. I wish we could correct typos…

  2. forked - Jan 24, 2013 at 12:28 PM

    The hyperventilating over this is ridiculous. Isn’t it cute?

  3. kicksave1980 - Jan 24, 2013 at 12:43 PM

    Pat Nevin is an idiot. The ball boy was wrong, but there is no reason whatsoever for Hazard to act like that. If the ball boy was intentionally stalling the game, surely it could’ve been added to extra time.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

PST Extra: Analyzing transfer deadline day