<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the United States should (and probably will) claim easy victory tonight over Canada</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prosoccertalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/why-the-united-states-should-and-probably-will-claim-easy-victory-tonight-over-canada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prosoccertalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/why-the-united-states-should-and-probably-will-claim-easy-victory-tonight-over-canada/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 23:16:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Davis</title>
		<link>http://prosoccertalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/why-the-united-states-should-and-probably-will-claim-easy-victory-tonight-over-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-8752</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Davis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 16:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prosoccertalk.nbcsports.com/?p=172592#comment-8752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly. The United States has been to every World Cup SINCE 1986. That was the last one in which the US was not a part.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. The United States has been to every World Cup SINCE 1986. That was the last one in which the US was not a part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purpleurkel</title>
		<link>http://prosoccertalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/why-the-united-states-should-and-probably-will-claim-easy-victory-tonight-over-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-8750</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[purpleurkel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 01:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prosoccertalk.nbcsports.com/?p=172592#comment-8750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;...Plus the obvious, that the United States has been to every World Cup since 1986, while the Canadians haven’t been to once since then.&quot;

The US national team qualified for the 1990 FIFA World Cup but NOT the 1986 FIFA World Cup.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1986_FIFA_World_Cup#Squads]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;Plus the obvious, that the United States has been to every World Cup since 1986, while the Canadians haven’t been to once since then.&#8221;</p>
<p>The US national team qualified for the 1990 FIFA World Cup but NOT the 1986 FIFA World Cup.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1986_FIFA_World_Cup#Squads" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1986_FIFA_World_Cup#Squads</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: korules</title>
		<link>http://prosoccertalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/why-the-united-states-should-and-probably-will-claim-easy-victory-tonight-over-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-8646</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[korules]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prosoccertalk.nbcsports.com/?p=172592#comment-8646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh my, this is entertaining!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my, this is entertaining!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wfjackson3</title>
		<link>http://prosoccertalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/29/why-the-united-states-should-and-probably-will-claim-easy-victory-tonight-over-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-8631</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wfjackson3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 04:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prosoccertalk.nbcsports.com/?p=172592#comment-8631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whoops!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
