Skip to content

Michael Bradley: Contributions to recent reports ‘shameful,’ ‘embarrassing,’ and cross the line

Mar 21, 2013, 12:32 AM EDT

United States v Antigua & Barbuda - World Cup Qualifier Getty Images

“I think it is shameful,” was Michael Bradley’s reaction. The U.S. Men’s National Team midfielder was asked for this thoughts on Monday’s Sporting News feature that detailed criticisms of U.S. head coach Jurgen Klinsmann.

Eleven current players as well as another 11 sources close to the team were given anonymity in exchange for their participation. For Bradley, their contributions amounted to a betrayal.

“[Y]ou cross a line when you take those thoughts and you take your disappointments outside of the team and outside of the inner circle,” Bradley told the assembled media in Colorado. “So for me, it doesn’t help anybody, it doesn’t help anything that we are trying to do this week.”

Bradley becomes the third veteran of the national team to offer his thoughts in the wake to the Sporting News’ piece. Carlos Bocanegra posted his thoughts on Facebook Monday night, a defense a Jurgen Klinsmann’s communication with his players. On Tuesday, Tim Howard spoke out against the notion that the U.S.’s is a locker room divided.

“On every team in the world, not every guy is going to be happy,” Bradley explained, “on every team in the world there are going to be guys who go back to their room and talk with their roommate about things that they wish were different, things they wish would be done another way, but that is normal.”

The problems start when those critiques go beyond the team’s inner circles. Or, as Bradley put it, when players don’t have “the balls” to speak in front of the group.

“When you play on a team you have a chance everyday to give everything you have and part of that means having the balls to say things to guys to their face, having the balls to say things in front of the team.

“In those ways it is really disappointing that in a week as important as this, with so much on the line, that you would have something like that happen.”

Bradley called for the U.S. to turn their attentions to the field, saying the team “let ourselves down a little bit” given the revelations in Sporting News’ work.

“It is our job to represent ourselves and represent our country in a way that makes everybody proud.”

With three veterans speaking out and another being named captain, the week’s controversy seems to be unifying the team – in word and action if not in actual camaraderie. The actual bonds between players can only be seen from inside the dressing room, though one thing we can infer from Bradley’s comments is that these issues had not been brought up within the group at large. If there is major dissension in the ranks, it’s not bubbling up for team-wide discussion.

Then again, that seems to be Bradley’s main issue. Reports say there are problems, their existence may go beyond a select few, yet the team leaders aren’t seeing anybody step forward to bring them to the group.

And that leaves the obvious, lingering question: Which players contributed to Sporting News’ report? Are these fringe players unhappy with Klinsmann’s decisions (and their roles in the team)? Are the most damning critiques — the ones creating the most waves — from players? Or are they from the sources most distant from the current core?

Because as of now, three of the team’s most important players have spoken out to clarify the situation. Though it’s possible they contributed in some form, they seem unlikely to be the ones giving the anonymous accounts. So, who did?

  1. Nick Webster - Mar 21, 2013 at 1:25 AM

    Where there’s smoke…you’ll find a naughty kid with matches.

    • wfjackson3 - Mar 21, 2013 at 11:53 AM

      Oh god, that brings back memories.

  2. jumpingnots - Mar 21, 2013 at 3:19 AM

    This is not the way to get a better team on the field,if you think as a player that something has to be changed in order to get a better performens on the field, you get the whole team together and the coach and then talk about the problems you think there are,the outside world has to stay out of it this.I was a soccer team captain for many years in Europe in my younger years and was 37 when I have to call it quit.Yes I also see problems with this US team we have at the moment, we have a long way to go before we can be called a real treat to the big boys in soccer.So get together talk about what you think has to be done but keep it inside.

  3. dfstell - Mar 21, 2013 at 8:36 AM

    You have to wonder…..I’m sure someone like Bradley has a pretty good idea of who said what. Think about when things like this happen in our own workplaces: There is always an secret person speaking, but when you look at the quotes, you KNOW that the complaints sound an awful lot like what Greg from accounting was complaining about in the cafeteria last week. Hmmm….maybe it was Greg?

    I don’t really view the whole thing as a negative though. Part of becoming a proper soccer nation is having jacka$$ stuff like this going on, media (perhaps) over-covering a non-story, etc.

    It’s also worth noting that none of these leaders are really speaking out about the Klinsmann problems with tactics and player selection. Bradley and Howard basically just said, “The team is unified. Players should shut up and play.” Boca said, “I don’t have a problem with Jurgen.” Nobody has said, “This story was complete crap. Jurgen is very clear about how he wants us to play on the field. Everyone understands exactly why is is playing so many defensive midfielders and why he can’t maintain a consistent line-up and why so many players are out-of-position and why Jozy is made to just stand there all by himself. In fact, we players LOVE everything that is going on tactically and know that our coach is head and shoulders above the other coach every time we go out there!”

  4. sdbeisbol - Mar 21, 2013 at 9:17 AM

    Why do I think it’s Altidore who said it? lol

  5. wfjackson3 - Mar 21, 2013 at 11:55 AM

    This post hits on what that story actually uncovered. There are players that are or have been involved in the USMNT that don’t have enough trust in their teammates to bring things to the veterans and captains in the squad. That is how this sort of thing is usually handled if someone doesn’t want to confront the coaches themselves, and it is one of the major responsibilities of team captains to act as liasons between the players and the coaches. If this didn’t reach the player leadership, then ultimately the SN story was just an indictment of the players.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!