Skip to content

Brutal weather conditions test both teams in U.S.-Costa Rica World Cup qualifier

Mar 22, 2013, 11:39 PM EDT

Costa Rica v United States - FIFA 2014 World Cup Qualifier Getty Images

COMMERCE CITY, Colo. – So what will we call this one? “La Guerra Blanca,” perhaps? That is, The White War … a la the famously frigid win over Mexico in 2001 known as “La Guerra Fria?”

Whatever we all call it, Friday’s World Cup qualifier outside Denver will be remembered for two things: a 1-0 win over Costa Rica in a night of weather madness,  where the United States got its World Cup qualifying effort back on track, even if the result was down to an early goal and survival from there.

Mostly, of course, a memorable night was made by the harsh elements. The game resembled soccer in a snow globe.

(MORE: Images of the Colorado snow globe.)

The fluffy stuff began about three hours before kickoff at Dick’s Sporting Goods Park. It had started to stick as goalkeepers came out for warm-ups. Two snow plows worked hard to get some of the field cleared by kickoff – How about about that, Red Bull Arena … snow plows? –  but it was more or less fruitless by halftime.

There was even some questions about whether this one might get postponed. One international match, Northern Ireland vs. Russia, had already been postponed Friday.

As for the decision making authority …

An official FIFA match commissioner on site presides over all decisions and disputes, everything from uniform color to the more important matters such as weather conditions.  So the call belonged to Victor Daniel, from Grenada, right up to kickoff. From there the decision belonged to referee Joel Aguilar of El Salvador.

(MORE: Breaking down Deuce’s game winner.)

By the 30th minute,  the Costa Rica bench begin chatting up the fourth officials, gesturing to the lines and such, presumably complaining about the match going on.

The players were clearly struggling with footing and with … well, with everything.

So, should the match have even been played? The upcoming schedule applied some pressure on the choice. It could have been postponed a day, but the weather forecasts call for lots more snow on Saturday, so that made little sense.

U.S. Soccer spokesman Neil Buethe said the choice of moving the game back two days was problematic due to the match upcoming against Mexico on Tuesday. To play on Sunday, fly on Monday and then play again at powerful Mexico on Tuesday would be soccer suicide.

With conditions getting no better, and the Costa Ricans still complaining, Aguilar stopped the match briefly at about 55 minutes. It was only, as it turned out, to clear the  lines and then resume play.

It looked to everyone as if Aguilar might be stopping the game. “That’s why I went on the field a little, with my bad Spanish, [to say] ‘there was no way we are stopping this game. ‘ “

Buethe announced to the press that previous information had been incorrect. In fact, a match abandoned due to weather would be resumed at the exact point at which it was called off.  At the 76th minute, U.S. Soccer passed the word that FIFA’s match commissioner had declared that the contest would be completed.

U.S. Soccer president Sunil Gulati said there was no discussion prior to the match about not going ahead with it.

So, should the match have been played. Said Gulati: “It’s up to the referee and match commissioner. We got it in. No injuries. I’d say the answer is “yes.’ “

  1. drewvt6 - Mar 23, 2013 at 12:08 AM

    Dear all you crazy ‘mls should play a winter season’ people,

    This is SPRING in Denver, Salt Lake City, New York, Boston, Toronto, Montreal, etc.

    You clearly have no experience with snowy weather. Go back to your southern climate.

    Signed,
    People who use reason

  2. dfstell - Mar 23, 2013 at 8:31 AM

    The thing I didn’t get was all the discussion about stopping the game. Sure, it was a crappy game for the players because of the snow, but was it really any worse than the rain/wind/mud on that cricket field in Antigua and Barbuda? That game completely made it difficult for the US, but nobody talked about suspending that game. Or I saw one of the group stage qualifiers in Guatemala and there were small ponds all over the field from the rain. It was insane….the ball would just STOP when it hit those patches of standing water and there were players flopping everywhere. Nobody complained about that game.

    It just seems unfair that if the Central American and Caribbean nations are allowed to use their heat/humidity/smog as a home field advantage, why can’t we use the occasional snow?

  3. tylerbetts - Mar 23, 2013 at 10:29 AM

    I like what Grant Wahl tagged the game: The SnowClásico.

    I was there. I’ve seen the highlights on TV. I think the viewing on TV was actually a little better than the viewing from the stands. At least on TV, you didn’t have sideways snow blowing into your eyes.

    But, my goodness, was that a fun game.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

PST Extra: Can United beat Chelsea?