Skip to content

United States lineup prediction vs. Panama

Jun 11, 2013, 6:15 AM EDT

SEATTLE, Wash. – Before Monday afternoon’s practice, U.S. men’s national players fulfilled their last public commitment ahead of Tuesday’s game, appearing in front the media before their final training session at CenturyLink Field. Among the day’s favorite topics – aside from the suspect turf, Seattle’s crowd, Panama – were subtle attempts to get players to reveal parts of Tuesday’s starting lineup.

On Friday in Jamaica, the U.S. carried over the XI who started five days earlier against Germany, the first time in Jurgen Klinsmann’s tenure the same lineup was used in consecutive games. But with midfielders Jermaine Jones (concussion recovery) and Graham Zusi (suspension) set to miss Tuesday’s match, that streak stops at two, and after nobody gave away any secrets at Monday’s practice, we’re left to our usual educated guesses as to who will take the field against Panama:

source:  Goalkeeper: Tim Howard’s firmly entrenched in the No. 1’s role, and while there was some constructive conversation this winter about the virtues of Brad Guzan, there’s been little desire to revisit that debate. The Everton-man will start on Tuesday.

Defense: With central midfield looking thin, Brad Evans would normally be considered as a potential partner for Michael Bradley. Not surprisingly, there’s been no discussion of that possibility, conventional wisdom holding the back line that started in Kingston will be kept in tact. That means central midfielder Brad Evans at right back, left midfielder DaMarcus Beasley at left back, with Omar Gonzalez partnering Matt Besler in the middle.

Midfield: Michael Bradley will start in the middle, with Geoff Cameron likely to get the call as Jones’s replacement. Klinsmann has been very complimentary of Cameron’s performance in Jamaica, with teammates echoing the coach’s praise. Sacha Kljestan may also be an option, but having started in the middle in the team’s disappointing performance against Belgium, the Anderlecht midfielder may miss out to the more stalwart option.

Fabian Johnson will start wide, but it’s unclear if he’ll be on his customary left side or on the right. Johnson acknowledged a switch is possible.

If that happens, the left side opens up for Eddie Johnson or Brad Davis. Johnson, who started on wide in the previous qualifying round, seems the more likely option, though if Fabian Johnson stays on the left, Tijuana’s Joe Corona could get the call on the right.

Forwards: With Jozy Altidore scoring in consecutive games, there’s little doubt the formerly drought-ridden striker will start up top. Clint Dempsey, a selection as guaranteed as Howard’s or Bradley’s, will wear the armband in support of Altidore.

  1. rafibomb10 - Jun 11, 2013 at 9:23 AM

    Richard, in your other post you talked about the possibility of the US moving to a 4-3-3, throwing more numbers at the problem. Honestly as a soccer coach, I don’t see it as “throwing numbers” but rather “balancing numbers.” You cant disagree the CM role is the most important role on the field, so why not have three players doing what two tend to struggle to do. Arsenal uses it, Barcelona, Spain, the best teams in the world. So to me actually I think its a good thing!

    In a perfect world I’d like to see MBradley getting a shot at the holding role at the bottom of the triangle, or the 6, much like Sergio Busquets occupies for Barcelona. He can distribute and his passing has never been lagging. In a higher role I’d like to see Holden, who will have protection from the other two in the middle. He is a good passer and I think the distributor role is perfect for him, much like the role Mikel Arteta plays for Arsenal, especially having protection from Bradley. And then the more dynamic CM I think would be perfect for Clint. Let him roam like Inesta does, splitting out wide at times, and holding up play with Jozy.

    That’s what I’d like to see.

    • Richard Farley - Jun 11, 2013 at 2:25 PM

      I personally would go 4-3-3, but I also know about .03 about these players as Klinsmann. Re: augmenting vs. balancing, that is interesting, huh? Suppose it just depends on how you view the U.S.’s needs without Jones (or, which words you like more). We very well might see more tweaks than this post predicts. Understandably, we’re being given imperfect information.

  2. crayzeeguy - Jun 11, 2013 at 4:19 PM


Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

MOTD: United's offensive struggles