Skip to content

FIFA denies Confederations Cup will be cancelled as protests intensify

Jun 21, 2013, 9:41 AM EDT

Brazil Soccer Confed Cup Protests AP

This morning FIFA have responded to various reports suggesting that the Confederations Cup currently going on in Brazil, will be abandoned after violent riots intensified over the last 24 hours across the South American country.

Soccer’s world governing body have said the tournament will not be abandoned after violent protests have continued to erupt over the past 24 hours.

Last night in Sao Paulo one protestor was killed after being hit by a car driven into a crowd. And CBN radio and Estado de Sao Paulo have been suggesting that the tournament could be cancelled as severe demonstrations  and unrest continue.

It was estimated that over 1 million protestors took to the streets on Thursday night, as people hit out at the government over corruption, rising prices and a lack of investment in services for the public.

Over 80 cities have now seen protests and some of the teams competing in the Confederations Cup have aired their unease at the violent anti-government demonstrations.

But when will the protests end?

It doesn’t seem like anytime soon. Police have clashed with the crowds but the number of protestors continues to grow and they certainly have the upper hand on the authorities. Originally the protests began after the government announced a price hike for bus and metro services in Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. Now it has become much more than that.

Several soccer players have come out in support of the protestors, with Brazilian internationals David Luiz and Lucas Leiva leading the way.

Although they both called for peaceful protests, the nature of the demonstrations against the Brazilian government are becoming more violent.

While Chelsea defender David Luiz had this to say, as Brazil booked their place in the semifinals of the tournament, and face Italy on Saturday afternoon in their final group game.

The people have the right to express their opinions and to protest when they are not happy with what is happening in their country. That’s the only way to call attention to what is wrong. I don’t live in Brazil, but I love my country. The Brazilians love their country and that’s why these protests are happening.

But when should FIFA step in and move the teams away from an unstable environment which is set to get worse before it gets better? That is a difficult conundrum to unravel.

World soccer’s governing body should not ignore the real issues that are affecting the people of Brazil. But it can’t help the situation tangibly.

One banner during Spain’s 10-0 demolition of Tahiti at the Maracana Stadium on Thursday read, “We want hospitals and schools in FIFA standards.”

Brazilians are upset that their government is spending over $16 billion on stadiums and infrastructure for a sporting event, yet other areas of the nation are being left woefully underfunded and neglected.

Like I said, FIFA can’t do much about it. But given the trouble and unrest and with stadium projects still being completed in plenty of cities, should the 2014 World Cup happen in Brazil next summer?

It has to.

Now the stadiums are being built and the money has been spent by the government, there is no turning back.

But maybe FIFA wishes there was, after the Confederations Cup regurgitated the huge number of social and political issues troubling the Brazilian people, government and their nation.

But for now, let the games continue.

  1. bigdinla - Jun 21, 2013 at 12:19 PM

    There is no way in hell I would go to this WC. There will be an unprecedented amount of violence and crime. Brazil does not have the forces necessary to keep fans safe!

    • pirovash88 - Jun 21, 2013 at 12:43 PM

      Yeah i agree, there’s no way i’d go. They need to choose hosting countries a little more wisely.

    • dfstell - Jun 21, 2013 at 1:49 PM

      I asked a Brazilian friend about attending the WC. He basically said that I should 100% visit Brazil……just not during the 2014 WC. He also said that I should 100% go to a WC……just not this one in Brazil.

      That seemed like pretty good advice.

  2. mikeevergreen - Jun 21, 2013 at 1:58 PM

    If I were England or the United States, I would start looking at making sure that at least 30 stadiums don’t ahve anything planned for the last 20 days of June and the first 14 of July next year.

  3. jrocknstuff - Jun 21, 2013 at 3:43 PM

    There’s no way to guarantee the safety of the athlete’s either. Terrible situation. But how can the gov’t justify spending $16 B when many citizens don’t have clean drinking water? If I’m the IOC I’m already in the process of moving the next summer games

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

MOTD: United's offensive struggles