Jul 11, 2013, 2:15 PM EDT
Michael Laudrup deserves credit, big time credit.
After delivering Swansea City their first major trophy in the club’s 100 year history this past spring, journos across the globe (myself included) pegged him to leave the Liberty Stadium for a more prestigious throne.
It was a move he seemed destined to make.
After all, three of his previous four club managerial appointments (Getafe, Spartak Moscow, Mallorca) had been one-and-dones. Only his first managerial stint, at boyhood club Brøndby, extended beyond one season.
He moved on for a variety of reasons, but mainly because of ambition and an inability to deal with boards, chairmen and owners who didn’t give him what he wanted. The later, of course, was largely a product of the former. Michael Laudrup simply wants to win.
That was the clear objective when the Dane arrived in South Wales last summer. His influence was immediate, bringing in a collection of high value, low cost players – Jonathan de Guzman (free loan), Chico Flores (£2 million [$3m]), Michu (£2 million [$3m]), Ki Sung-Yueng (£6 million [$9m]), Pablo Hernandez (£6 million [$9m]) – who would prove pivotal to the club’s League Cup triumph and 9th place finish in the league.
It was that success that raised eyebrows amongst big clubs across the globe. “Yes, there were clubs – a couple of big ones as well – who wanted me,” Laudrup said.
Real Madrid, Paris Saint Germain, Fenerbahce and Monaco were among the superpowers reportedly interested in bringing Laudrup to the next level. Yet with the lure of managerial riches and Champions League football, Laudrup signed a one year extension in March to continue managing the Swans.
But even after that move, many believed Laudrup might still be on his way out of Swansea. So when word hit papers that Laudrup was entangled in a bitter dispute with chairman Huw Jenkins over transfer funds, rumors regarding the manager’s pending departure kicked in to overdrive.
As Swans supporters gnawed their collective fingernails, the club started making moves.
First was the decision to bring in Jose Canas from Real Betis on a free. Then the Swans brought in cover at center-back, buying Juan Amat from Espanyol for £2 million ($3m), and at attacking midfield, signing Alejandro Pozuelo from Betis for £400k ($603k).
Despite the activity, the cut-rate prices didn’t seem to suggest that Laudrup was winning his transfer fund battle over Jenkins. That began to change last week when Jenkins matched his most expensive signing from 2012-13 by dropping £6 million ($9m) on Liverpool midfielder Jonjo Shelvey.
Today, however, it became crystal clear that Laudrup had gotten his way when Swansea smashed their transfer record by agreeing to a £12 million ($18m) deal to sign Ivory Coast international Wilfried Bony from Vitesse Arnhem. Signing Bony, who was the top scorer in the Eredivisie last season having scored 31 goals in just 30 matches, is a clear statement of the Swans’ intent to compete at the highest level.
And with that, all is well in South Wales. Laudrup has his signings and the board has a manager who they don’t need to worry about resigning. “[I]t wasn’t about saying I wanted this, this and this. Or I want £18m, £21m or £24m. It was about knowing we had to strengthen our team,” Laudrup told the South Wales Echo.
So credit to both sides on working through turmoil, but especially to Laudrup for fighting off the sweet smell of a big club move when it seemed easier than not to do so.
“Yes, there were clubs – a couple of big ones as well – who wanted me,” Laudrup admitted. “But I didn’t have to speak to anyone because I want to stay here. Please, never again ask me about my future – it’s a waste of time.”
Well, then. That settles that.
- What will Jurgen Klinsmann’s USMNT roster look like for 2015 Gold Cup? 2
- April Fools! The top gags that actually fooled soccer fans on this day 5
- PST’s Premier League award predictions: Here’s our Player of the Season 0
- PST’s Premier League award predictions: Here’s our Coach of the Season 0
- PST’s Premier League award predictions: Here’s our Team of the Season 3
- Who were biggest winners, losers from USMNT’s March friendlies? 5