Skip to content

Is David Moyes stubborn or silly when it comes to Cesc Fabregas?

Jul 25, 2013, 11:33 AM EDT


Despite having two bids immediately rejected by Barcelona, Manchester United manager David Moyes is not giving up in his quest to sign midfielder Cesc Fabregas.

Which begs the question, is Moyes being stubborn or just plain silly?

He’s stubborn (in the best way possible) if his efforts result in Barcelona selling Fabregas to United.

United’s first move for Fabregas on July 15 was for $38.2 million (£25m). Barcelona quickly rejected.

The second move for the midfielder made last week was understood to be in the region of $45.9 million (£30m)  plus add-ons. Again, Barcelona rejected on knee-jerk.

It now appears that Moyes is ready to table a third bid that will likely be somewhere between $53.5 million to $61.1 million (£35m to £40m). If the Catalan giants accept that bid then United will have their man and Moyes’ efforts will be classified as persistent. United will have their man, albeit at a slightly inflated price.

But if Barcelona deny the upcoming offer, many may consider Moyes to be a silly man.

Not only will he have failed to acquire the player he targeted to shore up the United midfield but, after having already missed out in his primary midfield target Thiago Alcantara, he also will have further dented the clout that Manchester United has long possessed in the transfer market. Under Sir Alex Ferguson, United’s transfer market power was unprecedented. If the club wanted a player, the club got that player – and typically at a favorable rate.

Moyes further risks looking campy because he continued to pursue the player despite the tea leaves appearing relatively straightforward.

After United’s first bid was rejected then Barcelona manager Tito Vilanova explained, “Cesc has told me he wants to stay here. He has told me it is his dream to stay with Barcelona. He doesn’t want to go to other teams for money reasons or playing time. He knows there is competition for places here, but his decision is to stay.”

Following United’s second second bid a Barcelona source said that “Fabregas is not for sale” and that “[t]he president [Sandro Rosell] has been very clear with Man United.”

In addition to the club’s stance, Barcelona center-back Gerard Pique said: “United are wasting their time. It took a long time for Cesc to get his dream move back home, and he won’t give it up. This is home, it is where his family is, and he is playing with his closest friends. He has told us he is happy, and that he intends to stay with Barcelona.”

Even Alex Song, who arguably suffers from less playing time because of Fabregas, expressed his disbelief at the Spaniard moving to Old Trafford. “I did not speak with him but I know Cesc is 100 per cent here. He loves Barcelona, he loves the club. He will stay here next season and give 100 per cent because I know him very well and he’ll want to fight. He’s focused on the club.”

Yet while all those quotes seem to indicate only one result, the reality is that they are circumstantial in nature.

We have not heard directly from Rosell that Barcelona refuse to Fabregas to Manchester United. And we have not heard directly from Fabregas that he refuses to move to Manchester United.

Until either of those things happen ‘sources’ will blab and teammates will pine but Moyes still stands a chance at coming out of this situation looking more stubborn than silly.


  1. NowWaitJustAMinute - Jul 25, 2013 at 12:34 PM

    I’m still confused by this. If Barca accepts Man Utd’s offer, doesn’t that trigger Arsenal’s buy back clause at 25M or whatever? So really, what is Man Utd’s play here? If Barca accepts, surely Arsenal executes and buys Cesc back.

    So, for instance, Barca accepts 40M from Man. Utd; Barca notifies Arsenal; Arsenal says thanks; Arsenal writes check for 25M, right? Barca just ends up with 15M less than it accepted.

    Am I missing something?

    • babatundew - Jul 25, 2013 at 1:25 PM

      Fabregas has to say that he wants to go Arsenal; it’s up to him not Arsenal

    • babatundew - Jul 25, 2013 at 1:30 PM

      “Under Sir Alex Ferguson, United’s transfer market power was unprecedented. If the club wanted a player, the club got that player – and typically at a favorable rate.” False. What about Hazard, Sneijder, Lucas Moura, Benzema, Bale? – Manchester United fan

  2. dfstell - Jul 25, 2013 at 1:26 PM

    Maybe he’s being a little bit silly, but United already have “good” players at the position. If they’re going to spend money to buy someone, it should be someone who is clearly much, much better than what they have. Otherwise they’re just buying another “good” player and they don’t need *another* good player…..they need someone great or it isn’t worth the effort and hassle.

    I tend to think Fabregas would be great and he’s worth pursuing, but with some of these other guys, they might as well play Cleverly and Anderson and Giggs and the kids from the academy. None of those guys are world-beaters, but I’m not sure some of these other names that get mentioned are world-beaters either.

  3. babatundew - Jul 25, 2013 at 1:31 PM

    “Under Sir Alex Ferguson, United’s transfer market power was unprecedented. If the club wanted a player, the club got that player – and typically at a favorable rate.” False. What about Hazard, Sneijder, Lucas Moura, Benzema, Bale? – Manchester United fan

  4. orenthal - Jul 25, 2013 at 2:47 PM

    I completely echo the last commentator. Of the last 3-5 years, only one team has had unrivaled success in the transfer market: Barcelona, which makes sense because they’ve been the team of the decade, revolutionized the game etc. Real has missed on players (Silva, Villa, Neymar) and so has bayern (suarez, lewandowski). Not only has Manchester United failed to get the players mentioned before, they also haven’t gotten favorable terms. For example, Berbatov cost the team a fortune as would bale, although that transfer won’t be happening. It’s illogical to suggest the same team that might break the transfer market to get bale or bring back cristiano ronaldo also receives great terms when purchasing players. Why would a team do them any favors, its usually the opposite: manu has to overpay to pluck a great talent from an epl or champions league rival. As a MUFC fan, I think this is just an attempt to make something out of nothing. United have get better simply by having their young players (welbeck chicharito, cleverly, jones, young etc) get older and wiser. They even added zaha. With fabregas, I think they’re just testing the market to see how hard of a stance barca or cesc take. If it works out he’ll be their star midfielder, if not, then they’ll move on and get better. To suggest ferguson would’ve gotten a better haul of transfers or fabregas himself is ludicrous considering he still works for united in a role similar to Pat Riley with the heat and had plenty of transfer failures himself.

  5. dalecooperscoffee - Jul 25, 2013 at 6:15 PM

    United had no contact with barca over thiago, so how could he have been their primary target??? It was pure media hype.

    As for fabregas, there must be some kind of encouragement coming from cescs camp for united to continue their pursuit.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

MOTD: United's offensive struggles