Skip to content

Eddie Johnson to D.C. is happening: What this means for Seattle, United

Dec 17, 2013, 4:40 PM EDT

eddie_johnson AP

If you’ve been following the Washington Post’s reporting on the deal (probably through Steven Goff’s Twitter feed), you know a Eddie Johnson-to-D.C. United deal has been done since last night. Throughout the day, approval from Major League Soccer headquarters was all that sustained Johnson’s tenuous links to Seattle, but by mid-afternoon New York time, the deal was done. The 29-year-old U.S. international was swapping rave green for red and black, with a yacht-load of allocation money set to arrive on Puget Sound.

How much allocation exactly? Who knows. As Goff perfectly puts it, “given MLS’s secrecy on such matters, (the amount) will probably never be revealed publicly.” If speculation about maximum allocation scenarios is true, the Sounders could get well north of half-a-million in funny money.

For a Seattle team revamping a roster after their 2013 collapse, that amount would be huge. Well, it’d be huge for any club, but for a team in the Sounders’ position, it would be especially useful. With Clint Dempsey, Obafemi Martins, and Osvaldo Alonso, Seattle has no more Designated Player (DP) spots, a mild inconvenience for a team that can go out and get Dempsey and Martins-level players. If they receive a big chunk of MLS’s play money, the Sounders can buy that last railroad, put hotels on those neglected green properties, and potentially pay down Alonso’s salary cap hit, freeing up a DP spot.

The Sounders have already added Stefan Frei in goal. Not a bad replacement for Michael Gspurning. They’ve taken on Chad Marshall in the middle of defense, and Kenny Cooper’s been tacked on up top. Very good and perhaps very good. They still have (a seemingly major) hole at left midfield, and Clint Dempsey still needs to show he can be the type of creative presence that Seattle’s counting on, but Adrian Hanauer’s putting in the time on Seattle’s phone lines. He’s already addressed two of his team’s problem areas.

Whether trading Johnson creates a third is open to debate. The U.S. international was the team’s best attacker last year, but in the wake of Seattle’s conference semifinal elimination at the boots of rival Portland, Johnson’s been thrown to the curb, awaiting a bus that will either take him out of town or try to run him over (depending on how you want to extend the metaphor). Regardless, the relationship between the Sounders and one of their best players was beyond repair, with Johnson becoming a convenient target for people searching for explanations.

The Sounders have admitted the locker room was bad at the end of last season, and Johnson was publicly campaigning for a new deal. (Remember the “pay me” goal celebration?) Owner Joe Roth cited players’ attitudes and lack of effort at the club’s annual business meeting, remarks that were seen as another instance of calling out Johnson (among others). After it became clear Johnson would not return, the magic Seattle conjured in 2012 with “E.J.” dwindled into a form of scapegoating.

Johnson is not an innocent party here. He played into it all, but as he appears set to move across the country, the question is whether Ben Olsen and United can avoid some of the pitfalls that befell Sigi Schmid and Seattle. Making him a Designated Player, as The Post’s reporting suggests they will, is a great start, as it gives Johnson the appreciation he feels he deserves. Given the state of United’s squad, D.C. are also likely to play directly to its new forward’s strengths, something that became an issue between Schmid and Johnson by season’s end. Averaging a goal every 167 minutes since returning to Major League Soccer, a committed Johnson is somebody D.C. can build around.

source: AP

With three wins in 2013, D.C. United set a Major League Soccer mark for futility despite winning the U.S. Open Cup. Now, they’re ready to make Eddie Johnson a Designated Player with the hope their attacking problems will be solved. (Photo: AP)

Of course, everybody will be wondering about personalities. Rightly or wrongly, Johnson’s acquired a certain reputation throughout his Major League Soccer career, flames of which will only be fanned by how he’s leaving Seattle. Olsen, a former U.S. international himself, is not known as somebody with a high tolerance for player entitlement. On the surface, this seems like a potentially combustable relationship.

While that’s certainly the case, implying Olsen can’t handle egos seems to short-change him as a coach. Perhaps, at 36 years old, Olsen still lacks the type of man management experience Schmid brought to bear on Johnson, but he won’t be completely ignorant of the need to employ different approaches with different players. That doesn’t mean one set of rules for E.J., another for the rest of the team (something Olden would probably frown on), but if it means having to go the extra mile to make sure you’re always on the same page as a key player, Olsen’s certainly capable of doing it.

At the end of Johnson’s time in Seattle, the Sounders were no longer willing to do that. They wanted to move on and are getting a huge chunk of allocation to do so. But that doesn’t mean Johnson can’t be productive for another team. The set of challenges you inherit with him are unique, but as the Sounders showed just 12 months ago, those challenges can be overcome.

  1. dws110 - Dec 17, 2013 at 5:10 PM

    I’ll miss his production, but there were enough extracurricular shenanigans (that goal celebration, getting banned from practice during the playoffs, his slagging the service from his SSFC teammates vs. USMNT) that it was time for him to move on.

    The impression I’m left with is that his own biggest enemy is his ego. No, I don’t think he was being paid commenserate with his goal scoring, but did he not know that he was signing with a salary-capped team? Of course the quality of service from the USMNT is going to be better than he got from some of the Sounders, but come on, man, some of those SSFC guys he’s bad-mouthing are barely making $40k a year, where does he get off cutting them down like that?

    Anyway, good luck to him. I’m glad he’s worked his way back to the USMNT, and I’ll be cheering for him in Brazil.

  2. takethelongview - Dec 17, 2013 at 5:19 PM

    Did Arnaud and Johnson overlaap in Kandsaas City? I wonder how their relationship is…

  3. mdac1012 - Dec 17, 2013 at 6:22 PM

    E.J. can be frustrating to fans, teammates and coaches but it’s a good move for D.C. who just got a considerable upgrade in talent. They now have a point man, still in his prime, to build their attack around.

  4. hildezero - Dec 17, 2013 at 8:44 PM

    United got better while Seattle got worse.

    • talgrath - Dec 18, 2013 at 4:10 AM

      In the sense that Johnson’s ability to score goals will be lightly missed, you are correct. But in the larger picture this was the right move on the Sounders part. With Lamar Neagle and Martins up top and Clint Dempsey as an attacking midfielder nobody is going to think of the Sounders offense as weak, albeit it might not be as scary on paper now (in theory the Sounders should have had an amazing offense this season, after all).

  5. seanb20124 - Dec 17, 2013 at 9:09 PM

    He and Olson were teammates in WC2006.

    Hope works or for the club

  6. talgrath - Dec 18, 2013 at 4:08 AM

    A lot is being said of Eddie Johnson being the lead goal-scorer for the Sounders, but let’s not forget that he had the lead by 1 goal. Both Martins (who I feel could be hugely impressive if he can stay healthy) and Lamar Neagle (who is paid peanuts, as this very blog noted when it called him the most cost efficient goal-scorer in MLS) scored 8 goals. Much like in the past, the Sounders have scored through many players last season, every single starter except for Leo Gonzalez and Michael Gspurning scored a goal in 2013. Johnson is a good forward, but the Sounders will be fine without him.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

Highlights: Swansea's win vs. Man United