Feb 6, 2014, 9:27 AM EDT
You know the backstory – Arsenal makes a cheeky bid of £40m and one pound last summer for an unsettled Suarez in the hope of triggering his buy-out clause only to learn that no £40m buy-out clause exists thereby pissing off Liverpool owner John W Henry who fearlessly tweets: “What do you think they’re smoking over there at Emirates?”
And now, six months later, the British press – those gluttons for drama – decided this weekend’s blockbuster was the perfect time to revisit the issue.
Despite the admission that the bid was provocative and “not the most subtle thing we have done,” Wenger said “there are no regrets.You have sometimes regrets when a player played for you, and scores goals or does well somewhere else [but] he was never our player. It is just a situation that did not come off and that is it.”
In other words, John W Henry, Arsenal was smoking the opportunity to purchase a world-class striker at a cut-rate price. Sounds a bit crazy to claim £40m “cut-rate” but with Suarez’ sensational 23 goal haul in 19 appearances in hand few can deny his current market value is in the neighborhood of the £85m Real Madrid paid Tottenham for Gareth Bale last summer.
So credit to Wenger for standing strong on making that move. Yes, it was one that justifiably pissed off Liverpool but all’s fair in love and war. And the mere ambition of Arsenal to try and make that swoop is one that will fill Goonahs with hope that the notoriously conservative club will fearlessly charge forward when a good deal pops its head (or in the case of Suarez, seems to pop its head).
That being said, Liverpool has all the right in the world to be offended. Despite making it clear they wouldn’t be selling Suarez yet Arsenal still came at them. In the tricky world of transfer market ethics, calling ‘foul’ on Wenger & Co. seems justified.
Although the North London club did have intelligence (for lack of a better term) that claimed Suarez had a buy-out clause, when he didn’t. Wenger was not asked where that information came from, who supplied it and if there has been any punishment for providing such bad information.
When asked whether he might try again for Suarez in the summer, Wenger responded in his typically sheepish tone, “at the moment, no,” reinforcing his ‘no regrets’ stance and refusing to succumb to guilt for making the move.
Ultimately for Wenger, it comes down to winning. In his book the Suarez narrative is a red herring – something to get you and I fired up as we sip that first delicious Guinness at 7:45am on Saturday morning.
“For us, the important thing is to win the game,” Wenger added. “The fact about what happened in the summer [with Suárez] is nothing to do with that… The philosophy on our side has to be the same: to master the ball and to dominate the game.”
- MLS preview: FC Dallas vs. Sounders, Whitecaps vs. Timbers headline Week 4 0
- Report: Liverpool’s Daniel Sturridge to miss a month with hip injury 7
- EURO 2016 preview: Qualifying resumes for England, Spain, Germany, Italy 0
- Lionel Messi earns $1.4 million per week, tops Cristiano Ronaldo, Neymar as richest player 4
- Morgan Schneiderlin wants Southampton exit if they fail to make UEFA Champions League 4
- VIDEO: Cristiano Ronaldo could be fined, suspended for “calm down” celebration 6