Apr 19, 2014, 11:31 AM EST
Following Tottenham’s 3-1 win over Fulham on Saturday, you’d think Spurs manager Tim Sherwood would have been a happy bunny this Easter.
Not so much.
When naming his 18-man squad for the London derby vs. Fulham, Sherwood left out Sandro as the Brazilian holding midfielder has been in and out of the team due to injuries and loss of form amongst other reasons.
Sandro took to Twitter on Saturday morning to let fans know he wasn’t injured, and one brave journalist asked Sherwood about Sandro’s Tweet in the post-match press conference.
“He’s entitled to do what he wants. He’s right, he’s not injured. He’s not good enough to play in my team at the moment and when I think that he is good enough he will play,” Sherwood said bluntly. “I don’t care about reputation. I like Sandro as a kid. He has got qualities but I am picking people ahead of him.”
Wowza. You have to admire Sherwood’s honesty and ability to take the bull by the horns. It is refreshing to see a manager speak his mind and not put any spin on simple decisions. Quite simply, Spurs are stacked with several holding midfielders in the Sandro mold and Sherwood can only pick one or two per game.
What does it say for Sandro’s future at White Hart Lane? Not much. Sherwood will likely not be in charge next season and the Brazilian midfielder will be on a clean slate with another manager. Sandro, 25, hasn’t done much wrong and is as honest they come in the engine room. However I suspect Sandro will think twice before sending out another Tweet on team matters.
Here’s the Tweet Sandro sent out. What do you think? Innocent or a subtle dig at Sherwood?
- MLS Week 1 preview: Sounders vs. Revs, Timbers vs. RSL headline First Kick weekend 0
- FA Cup preview: Wembley trips on the line as Man United, Arsenal, Liverpool shoot for semis 0
- Now that it’s happening, MLS’s 20th season is sure to be the best one yet 4
- 2015 MLS season preview: LA Galaxy 1
- 2015 MLS season preview: Portland Timbers 0
- PST predicts Major League Soccer’s 2015 standings; Do you agree? 9