Skip to content

Defining and explaining the successful – and new – US formation against Nigeria

Jun 8, 2014, 10:00 AM EDT

Beckerman AP

JACKSONVILLE, Fla — Before kickoff against Nigeria, Jurgen Klinsmann made three changes to the side that played decent against Turkey, and the country tried to figure out exactly how the players fit together.

90 minutes later, after a 2-1 win over Nigeria that felt a bit more complete than the scoreline showed, there was a shower of praise for how the players fit together tactically.

Except still, nobody could figure out exactly what to call it or how to define it.

On the heels of Klinsmann’s rant slamming the discussion of formations altogether, there was a guilty feeling that accompanied any attempts to label how the individual US players pieced together on the pitch.

It was like a piece of IKEA furniture – confusing at first, requiring a lot of work to put together, and without a comprehensive set of instructions, but once it does come together right, it serves its purpose well.

“We started off a little bit lethargic,” said Alejandro Bedoya. “It took a little bit of getting used to, but we did what was asked of us.”

It took time to sink in because the tactic was brand new to the entire squad, implemented by Klinsmann just in the past few days.

“We felt in the Turkey game that they were able to get into some dangerous spots on us,” Beckerman said. “We worked on it this week, it was new to us, but we felt like if we’re all working for each other and backing each other up, that we can be successful.”

Bedoya labeled the formation a 4-3-2-1.  Beckerman anchored the epicenter of the midfield, with Jones to his left and Bedoya on his right.  There was an expectation for both Bedoya and Jones that they would advance further outside on attacks to expand the advance, and pinch in when the team moved back towards their own goal.

“Our focus this week was to get everybody behind the ball, because we’re playing against good teams and they’re going to have possession,” Beckerman said. “But if we can keep them from being dangerous then their possession doesn’t mean anything. We felt if we could win the ball then we could expose them with some numbers, so we defended together, we had each other’s backs, and when we won the ball we got into some dangerous spots.”

source: Getty Images

Jurgen Klinsmann taught the team a brand new formation just a week before the World Cup, but it worked to perfection against Nigeria, and could be used in Brazil.

With the midfield secure, the two above them in Dempsey and Bradley also weren’t defined into any particular locations, but flowed freely between the central midfield and the front line.

It fit perfectly with how Klinsmann described Spain’s 4-6-0 in Euro 2012, using random midfielders pushing forward to throw off the opposition. While it wasn’t nearly that radical, it employed the same general concept.

It wasn’t always Altidore up top who was the most dangerous man.  Dempsey and Bradley flowed freely and made runs, leaving Nigeria guessing as to who would come at them next.

The catch with this build is that it involves lots of running, but the US proved they were in excellent physical condition, and had the stamina to make it happen.

“In this position, you have to run more,” said Jermaine Jones. “Kyle played the “six” with Bedoya on the right and me on the left. In front was Michael and Clint, and Jozy on top. But the game shows there are differences, I have to be more inside with Kyle or out on the left side.  This is why I say I have to run a lot.”

The 32-year-old then said with a chuckle, “sometimes for the old guys that is not so good.”  It drew a laugh from the scrum of reporters, but the point was there – if the US is to deploy this tactic against Ghana, they will need to be at full fitness levels to run the formation to completion.

All that running comes from the polarizing difference in the formation between the compact defense and wide-open offense, like a hollow-point bullet expanding on impact for maximum damage.  With the tactic so new to just about everyone, it took some time in the beginning to settle in, but once they figured it out, the team became deadly.

“It took us a while to get into the game because we couldn’t keep the ball the first 20-25 minutes long enough to play out of the situation and switch sides and make it open,” Klinsmann said. “Once we understood to make the field more wide, to stretch it – almost cost me my voice – we looked better, and we started to have more flow and better combinations.  We started to play more simple, one-two touches from the back into the midfield, and finding Jozy.”

And ultimately, that’s the key – finding Jozy. With the service he got from this wide-open attack, he flourished, bagging first a sitter and then a ripper, the perfect combination for him going into Brazil.

But the formation is built on compact defense first, and from the get-go that was never an issue for the players.  “It involves a lot of running between me, Kyle, and Jermaine,” said Bedoya. “We shift into one side, making sure to stay compact, and then if they switch it to get back over.  With the connections between me and Fabian, and Jermaine, and Beasley at left-back, it’s a work in progress but defensively I think we did well.”

The dichotomy of the new 4-3-2-1 worked, throwing Nigeria not only into confusion at the back but a spider web at the front, entangling their link-up play in the US midfield thicket.

Whether you agree with teaching the team a brand new formation a week before the World Cup or not, the results on the pitch in Jacksonville are undeniable. If Klinsmann can teach a completely new tactic in just a few days, then it seems logical he could work the kinks out between now and June 16 when the US opens with Ghana.

Who knows if Klinsmann will choose to build upon this for the World Cup, but he would be wise to give it serious consideration, because he seems to have found the launch button that could potentially bring this United States squad success at Brazil that seemed out of reach just two matches ago.

  1. jimmycrackcorn99 - Jun 8, 2014 at 10:27 AM

    It worked because they took it up the middle offensively. I’m not sure that this is what you want to do against every team (as opposed to whipping in crosses into the box we saw from Davis & Bedoya against Azerbaijan) but in this case it worked against Nigeria. With Ghana’s middle defender out with an injury maybe a harbinger of Game 1 tactic…

    I still would have liked to see more clinical finishing. It was disastrous in 2nd half.

  2. overtherepermanently - Jun 8, 2014 at 12:13 PM

    The formation works…and makes me think that Maurice Edu should be on the roster if they are going to play it for 3 games.

  3. jdfsquared - Jun 8, 2014 at 1:48 PM

    Dare we hope…?

  4. el timo - Jun 8, 2014 at 5:11 PM

    Are we clear now why certain players had to be cut? ARE WE CLEAR?

    Crystal.

    • handsofsweed - Jun 8, 2014 at 7:13 PM

      I didn’t understand before. Now I get it. It wasn’t LD’s SKILL level that was the issue at his age. It was LD’s overall FITNESS level that was pretty good, but just not good enough to run this particular formation that JK believes in.

      And we just saw JK’s tactics, formation and game plan show signs what look to be venomous fangs. This team is going to compete.

      C’mon, WC….. get here!

  5. bigdinla - Jun 8, 2014 at 11:55 PM

    I liked the formation, but it is clear Beckerman is the weak link in that starting 11.
    As to the disastrous 2nd half, it wasn’t until Gooch Jr(Gonzales) was subbed in that the defense truly unraveled. I would still like to see Fabian on the left and Yedlinmonntue right.

    • ascriptlikethis - Jun 9, 2014 at 11:03 AM

      Funny how you say how it’s so “clear” that Beckerman is the weak link and then blame the second half collapse entirely on Gonzales’ substitution, not also noting that the defensive structure in general suffered once Beckerman, the defined No. 6, came off, effectively removing the defense’s shield. Beckerman isn’t an athlete, but he’s a tireless, disciplined, and smart player. He barely put a foot wrong against a Nigeria team that possesses the speed that is supposed to expose him. I would love some specific examples of why you believe he is clearly the weak link, because I didn’t see them.

  6. menessy27 - Jun 9, 2014 at 6:21 PM

    I mean it’s nice and all but it’ll all be pointless when we go extremely defensive vs Germany and Portugal and get knocked out. Klinsmann couldn’t have tried this out a year ago and given us time to actually perfect it and fully implement it?

  7. mikeevergreen - Jun 10, 2014 at 12:15 PM

    This kind of formation makes Michael Bradley a very dangerous man, almost sinister. Beckermann, too. Jermain Jones seems to have bought into this, I didn’t see him forward much. This formation beat Ghana. Christmas in June using the Christmas tree.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

PST Extra: The Manchester derby