Skip to content

Germany formation against Ghana sheds light on Klinsmann’s roots

Jun 21, 2014, 7:07 PM EDT

71405901-per-mertesacker-joachim-loew-juergen-klinsmann-and

When the German formation to play Ghana was released, there was a striking familiarity to it.

If you noticed it too, that’s because US fans have seen it before.

Jurgen Klinsmann played exactly the same 4-3-2-1 formation in their match against Ghana, as well as against Nigeria in the final friendly of the send-off series.

In fact, it’s so similar, you can pick out direct comparisons in player styles between the two teams.

The official match printout doesn’t hide the similarities, with even the layout exactly the same:

After the game, the Germans described their formation as a 4-2-3-1, but viewing the players involved, and you can see the direct correlation.

Philipp Lahm in the holding role = Kyle Beckerman.  Tony Kroos at the wing, a player who can run a lot and play both forward and back = Alejandro Bedoya. Sami Khedira, normally a defensive midfielder tasked with clogging the middle on defense and stretching wide on offense = Jermaine Jones.

[ MORE: Three areas of focus for the U.S. against Portugal ]
[ POSNANSKI: Confidence and the unconventional Klinsmann ]

Then you move forward.  Mesut Ozil, known for his dynamic abilities and versatility = Clint Dempsey. Mario Gotze (while this isn’t the best of comparisons) is an attacking midfielder who relies on creativity through the middle to produce for teammates = Michael Bradley.

Obviously there’s a gap in quality, but the styles are almost exactly the same in every position.

Now the question becomes, did Germany use this layout thanks to the US victory over Ghana, or is it something they’ve utilized in the past? The answer is it’s been used before, as they employed the exact same lineup in the 4-0 victory over Portugal.

So, as we can see, while Klinsmann has been successful molding his abilities and coaching styles to the players available to him in the United States, there are still German roots he taps into on occasion, and the victory over Ghana was one of them.

The downfall for Germany came in their midfield.  Philipp Lahm and Sami Khedira both had a poor games in their holding roles. They combined for just one lone tackle completed, and their marking was poor, which allowed Ghana to build better chances up the middle.

[ MORE: Conditions in Manaus won't be new for the U.S. ]

In comparison, Jermaine Jones and Kyle Beckerman combined for seven tackles and two interceptions, and Jones was a beast in the air.  As a result, if forced Ghana much further wide. In addition, Toni Kroos had a great game passing, but his side was vulnerable to the Ghanian attack, and they took advantage:

source:

Photo credit: FourFourTwo

source:

Photo credit: FourFourTwo

 

 

 

 

 

As you can see, there was much more available for Ghana in the middle against Germany, and everything against the United States came from out wide.

It could be argued that in this formation that’s obviously rooted in German soccer, the United States deployed it better than the origins of the style.

The goal was a war of attrition against the Ghanians, and the United States won, whereas the Germans couldn’t pull it off.

  1. talgrath - Jun 21, 2014 at 8:41 PM

    That’s a very interesting break down, it makes watching these last few matches of the group all the more interesting. Might Klinsmann change his line up against Germany to throw them off?

  2. metroplexfrog - Jun 21, 2014 at 10:30 PM

    JK will have to get the team sheet right. Will Zuzi or Bedoya start, who will replace Altidore, how will the US attack the Portugal defense missing key pieces.

    Should be a very interesting tactical game.

  3. redrock81 - Jun 22, 2014 at 12:21 AM

    “The goal was a war of attrition against the Ghanians, and the United States won, whereas the Germans couldn’t pull it off.”

    uhm, you forgot to mention 1 very crucial thing here. The US faced most of the Ghanaian bench while Germany didn’t. In fact, Ghana coach Kwesi Appiah was heavily criticized for putting younger, less experienced players in the line up against the US. That should matter. And just because Germany tied with Ghana and the US won against Ghana isn’t a reason to rule them out. Germany is still as deadly if not even more.

    • booger1234 - Jun 22, 2014 at 10:30 AM

      Seriously? The lineups were pretty much the same. 3 minor changes one defender the GK and Boateng. Yet Boateng didnt do crap in either game. The GK and the defender in question was a wash! Germany lacked the ability to get back and defend which the US did not. The germans got cought forward way to much and didnt get back at all. I am not bashing germany they just looked un-like themselves for sure. But the US got back and defended well as a team for the most part. They didnt let Ghana beat them on the break unlike Germany who could have easily lost that Game the way they played.

  4. lyleoross - Jun 22, 2014 at 11:49 AM

    After watching Ghana against Germany, I realized that it isn’t that FIFA is corrupt or incompetent, they just accidentally got the ranking for Switzerland and Ghana switched. Silly mistake that. :)

  5. martin492013 - Jun 22, 2014 at 12:21 PM

    The US got back because they parked the damn bus for the entire second half and it almost cost them.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

Week 8: Saturday PL recap